4 thoughts on “Yang Zi complained that La Xiabeel's company was compensated 250,000! What warning role does this matter?”
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Shopping Cart
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Yang Zi sued Rathamber's company and received 250,000 compensation. This incident played a warning role. The law was justice. Some black -hearted companies kept squeezing on the benefits of celebrities. As long as the stars were held accountable, there would be a way to take advantage of the dividends brought by the benefits of celebrities. Essence Lathamber's company only signed two years of contracts with Yang Zi. Due to the end of the contract, the identity of the spokesperson no longer exists. Learn about it!
1, Yang Zi sued Ratham Bell's company
This is indeed very wronged, and fans are extremely angry. Some brands will be popular for celebrities, and they will appear in the unknown brands without any well -known brands. La Xiabeel is a big brand. Its company is also relatively loud. Yang Zi invited Yang Zi to the spokesperson. The contract between the two parties has been signed for two years, but there is a overlord clause on it, that is, the Yang Zi contract period is two years, but there is a life endorsement, and there is a dispute between the two. So Yang Zi's lawsuit brought the company to the court. Fortunately, the result was very popular and received 250,000 compensation. It is believed that through this legal lawsuit, other companies have made other companies become cold and not easily used star photos.
, what warning role does this matter?
This mainly played two warning role. First, it preached legal justice. The company has always put Yang Zi on the most eye -catching position on his online page. Although Yang Zifang has clearly warned the other party, the other party still has no intention to get off the shelves, so Yang Zi protects his own interests through legal weapons. Second, remind other companies. Although it only lost 250,000, it also had a negative impact on the company's reputation, and consumers would be very cautious when choosing to buy. Due to this lawsuit, the company lost the favorability of many passers -by, which is a kind of behavior.
In short, instead of deliberately using a careful machine in the contract in order to save money, it is better to make the product well,
Yang Zisheng's lawsuit wake up the companies that infringe on the right to portrait and reputation in order to benefit the benefits. The law is to protect the right to portrait and reputation of each citizen. Severe punishment.
The explanation given to us this matter is that some brands should not use some stars' portraits without authorization, and do not make some infringement behaviors.
Stars must pay attention to their own legitimate rights and interests. Once infringement occurs, it is necessary to protect the legitimate rights and interests through legal channels and cherish their feathers.