4 thoughts on “Yang Zi complained that Lathar Bell's company infringement and the amount of compensation was 250,000. What was going on?”

  1. La Xiabeel Company used Yang Zi's portrait to advertise for two years, completely disturbing the business law and violating Yang Zi's right to portrait.
    I originally cooperated with Latham Bell, and she was the spokesperson for a brand of La Xiabeel. However, after the contract expires, the company continues to use Yang Zi's portraits to do some publicity. Therefore, Yang Zi brought La Xia Bell to the court. The other party is required to compensate and apologize. Netizens still support her behavior very much.
    The amount of compensation for the other party was 2.5 million. When the court tried the case, the court felt that the amount was a bit high. Yang Zi's reputation caused serious damage, and her social status was still the same. So consider it as appropriate, let the other party compensate 250,000, delete some photos and apologize.
    has always bought Lamabel clothes before. In fact, in the past few years, their brand was still doing well. Some clothes were bought back, and the quality was slightly better. You can wear it for several years. But in recent years, it seems that it is not very good, the style is not novel enough, and the quality is not good. There are a few sweaters who buy it back and wear it for a few months. I have always felt that La Xiabeel's sales are still good. Every time I buy it, there are more people. Now that this happens, it turns out that they want to save even advertising fees. Xiaobian thinks that their company does have certain problems. It may be more difficult to do recently.

    Anyway, La Xiabeel's move is inappropriate. Today, the development of the e -commerce industry is in full swing, and now the entity is really very difficult to do, but it should be put on the product on the product. As long as your product is done well, the quality is good, and you are not afraid of no sales. Of course, if a star encounters such a thing, you can also pick up the weapons of law to protect your rights.

  2. This is because the other party violates her portrait rights and infringe her privacy. It is a rumor and insult to her, so she will ask the other party to compensate.

  3. Because in this brand of online stores, without Yang Zi's consent to use his portrait, the machine will be considered by consumers to think that Yang Zi has participated in the endorsement. He has caused a lot of losses.

Leave a Comment

Shopping Cart